Chapter 5: Vision Model – A Societal Blueprint Based on Non- Possessive EconomyChapter

Introduction

When wealth, governance, and social structures are reimagined through the lens of faith, a new societal model begins to emerge—one that transcends both modern capitalism and traditional socialism. This vision is not driven by the logic of possession or the consolidation of power, capital, or status. Instead, it is rooted in creativity, service, and trust—a spiritual return to a system where “loving your neighbor as yourself” and “having all things in common” become practical societal foundations.When wealth, governance, and social structures are reimagined through the lens of faith, a new societal model begins to emerge—one that transcends both modern capitalism and traditional socialism. This vision is not driven by the logic of possession or the consolidation of power, capital, or status.

Instead, it is rooted in creativity, service, and trust—a spiritual return to a system where “loving your neighbor as yourself” and “having all things in common” become practical societal foundations.

“All the believers were together and had everything in common. They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need.” (Acts 2:44–45)

This description of the early church is not an unattainable utopia. It is a historically grounded example of shared governance, faith-based community, and ethical economics. The Non-Possessive Economy translates this spirit into a modern institutional model— returning wealth to its true purpose: serving others, not hoarding for self.“All the believers were together and had everything in common. They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need.” (Acts 2:44–45)

This description of the early church is not an unattainable utopia. It is a historically grounded example of shared governance, faith-based community, and ethical economics. The Non-Possessive Economy translates this spirit into a modern institutional model— returning wealth to its true purpose: serving others, not hoarding for self.

This chapter outlines a visionary societal structure based on non-possessive principles, covering:This chapter outlines a visionary societal structure based on non-possessive principles, covering:

A balanced mechanism between fairness and respect for individual differencesA balanced mechanism between fairness and respect for individual differences

A diversified incentive system: combining monetary rewards, honor, and well-beingA diversified incentive system: combining monetary rewards, honor, and well-being

A governance structure integrating rule of law and spiritual faithA governance structure integrating rule of law and spiritual faith

A customer-driven enterprise ecosystem with crisis self-correctionA customer-driven enterprise ecosystem with crisis self-correction

A democratized startup model where customers act as “angel investors”A democratized startup model where customers act as “angel investors”

An “Amoeba-style” decentralized structure of shared intelligenceAn “Amoeba-style”

decentralized structure of shared intelligence

This vision does not depend on centralized authority or free-market absolutism. Instead, it proposes a system governed by spiritual self-awareness, constitutionally guaranteed equity, and decentralized organization—a society of “order in freedom, economy in love.”This vision does not depend on centralized authority or free-market absolutism. Instead, it proposes a system governed by spiritual self-awareness, constitutionally guaranteed equity, and decentralized organization—a society of “order in freedom, economy in love.”

5.1  Balancing Fair Distribution and Respect for Differences

A mature non-possessive economic system must both acknowledge differences in individual creativity and contributions, and incorporate balancing mechanisms to prevent class solidification and societal fragmentation caused by disparities in ability or starting point.

True fairness is not about equal outcomes, but rather about fair starting points, transparent processes, just rules, and granting each individual dignity and space to flourish according to their nature.A mature non-possessive economic system must both acknowledge differences in individual creativity and contributions, and incorporate balancing mechanisms to prevent class solidification and societal fragmentation caused by disparities in ability or starting point. True fairness is not about equal outcomes, but rather about fair starting points, transparent processes, just rules, and granting each individual dignity and space to flourish according to their nature.

As 1 Corinthians 12 teaches: “The body is not made up of one part but of many... The eye cannot say to the hand, ‘I don't need you!’ And the head cannot say to the feet, ‘I don't need you!’” Just as each part of the body plays a unique role, so does each person in the economic

society. Non-possessive economics advocates structural mechanisms—not violent revolutions—to achieve a state where “each fulfills their role and rejoices in it.”As 1 Corinthians 12 teaches: “The body is not made up of one part but of many... The eye cannot say to the hand, ‘I don't need you!’ And the head cannot say to the feet, ‘I don't need you!’” Just as each part of the body plays a unique role, so does each person in the economic society. Non-possessive economics advocates structural mechanisms—not violent revolutions—to achieve a state where “each fulfills their role and rejoices in it.”

Thus, the institutional framework should include:Thus, the institutional framework should include:

Maximum Income Gap Limitation: Establish through corporate constitutions a cap on income disparity (e.g., the highest income may not exceed the lowest by more than 20x) to avoid social unrest and internal corruption.Maximum Income Gap Limitation: Establish through corporate constitutions a cap on income disparity (e.g., the highest income may not exceed the lowest by more than 20x) to avoid social unrest and internal corruption.

Internal Value Assessment System: Create multi-dimensional evaluation systems including customer feedback, peer reviews, and contribution indices, shifting away from purely monetary metrics.Internal Value Assessment System: Create multi-dimensional evaluation systems including customer feedback, peer reviews, and contribution indices, shifting away from purely monetary metrics.

Trait-Respectful Job Design: Configure roles based on compatibility rather than competition, allowing individuals to shine within roles that match their temperament, capacity, and convictions.Trait-Respectful Job Design: Configure roles based on compatibility rather than competition, allowing individuals to shine within roles that match their temperament, capacity, and convictions.

Diverse Evaluation and Promotion Paths: Enable people with different styles, rhythms, and personalities to rise through multiple channels, ensuring leadership is not monopolized by the extroverted, elite, or dominant voices.Diverse Evaluation and Promotion Paths: Enable people with different styles, rhythms, and personalities to rise through multiple channels, ensuring leadership is not monopolized by the extroverted, elite, or dominant voices.

The ultimate goal is not a repressive “equality,” but a community where differences are appreciated, roles are complementary, and everyone thrives together. As 1 Corinthians 14:40 reminds us: “But everything should be done in a fitting and orderly way.”The ultimate goal is not a repressive “equality,” but a community where differences are appreciated, roles are complementary, and everyone thrives together. As 1 Corinthians 14:40 reminds us: “But everything should be done in a fitting and orderly way.”

5.2  Diverse Incentives: Money, Honor, and Well-being

In a Non-Possessive Economy, incentive mechanisms are not rejected—in fact, they are regarded as essential to nurturing human creativity and commitment. What we oppose is

the dominance of a singular, money-centered incentive structure. While money is an effective motivator, excessive financial incentives can lead to possessive impulses, inflated egos, and societal stratification. Thus, a non-possessive framework advocates for a diversified incentive system—one that integrates financial reward, public honor, social welfare, and spiritual fulfillment. This ensures that founders and contributors achieve personal meaning and social respect without needing ownership or inheritance rights.In a Non-Possessive Economy, incentive mechanisms are not rejected—in fact, they are regarded as essential to nurturing human creativity and commitment. What we oppose is the dominance of a singular, money-centered incentive structure. While money is an effective motivator, excessive financial incentives can lead to possessive impulses, inflated egos, and societal stratification. Thus, a non-possessive framework advocates for a diversified incentive system—one that integrates financial reward, public honor, social welfare, and spiritual fulfillment. This ensures that founders and contributors achieve personal meaning and social respect without needing ownership or inheritance rights.

Key components of this diversified incentive model include:Key components of this diversified incentive model include:

Fair Financial Rewards: Founders and core contributors should enjoy financial freedom, but within a capped structure (e.g., after-tax income no more than $5 million annually). Excess earnings are redistributed to employees and consumer reward pools. This curbs the “incentive paradox” and sets an ethical precedent.Fair Financial Rewards: Founders and core contributors should enjoy financial freedom, but within a capped structure (e.g., after- tax income no more than $5 million annually). Excess earnings are redistributed to employees and consumer reward pools. This curbs the “incentive paradox” and sets an ethical precedent.

Public Honor and Formal Recognition: An institutional honor system should be established to celebrate founders and outstanding employees—such as “Annual Innovation Award,” “Social Impact Medal,” and “Moral Role Model Citation.” These are selected transparently by both employees and customers, fostering a culture of value-centered recognition.Public Honor and Formal Recognition: An institutional honor system should be established to celebrate founders and outstanding employees—such as “Annual Innovation Award,” “Social Impact Medal,” and “Moral Role Model Citation.” These are selected transparently by both employees and customers, fostering a culture of value-centered recognition.

Special Treatment and Welfare: Provide housing, transportation, education, and healthcare support for key members—not as cash, but as services or platform privileges. This nurtures a sense of belonging and collective responsibility.Special Treatment and Welfare: Provide housing, transportation, education, and healthcare support for key members—not as cash, but as services or platform privileges. This nurtures a sense of belonging and collective responsibility.

Self-Realization and Spiritual Fulfillment: Position the enterprise as a platform for spiritual growth and public service. Work is not just a livelihood, but a life mission. Offer space for

belief, voice, and participation so that individuals can journey from “Who am I?” to “Why do I act?”Self-Realization and Spiritual Fulfillment: Position the enterprise as a platform for spiritual growth and public service. Work is not just a livelihood, but a life mission. Offer

space for belief, voice, and participation so that individuals can journey from “Who am I?” to “Why do I act?”

Reconstruction of Social Values: Through media, education, and cultural narratives, shift societal focus from wealth and power to contribution, self-actualization, and moral respect. Only by realigning the value compass can we uproot the possessive mindset.Reconstruction of Social Values: Through media, education, and cultural narratives, shift societal focus from wealth and power to contribution, self-actualization, and moral respect. Only by realigning the value compass can we uproot the possessive mindset.

Historical Reference:Historical Reference:

In 1950s China, the spirit of selfless dedication—exemplified by figures like Lei Feng— shaped an altruistic social atmosphere. In the 1980s, the rise of intellectual respect and scientific contribution redefined success. The Non-Possessive Economy seeks to rekindle this spirit: to celebrate diverse forms of achievement and replace materialism with meaningful, purpose-driven incentives.In 1950s China, the spirit of selfless dedication— exemplified by figures like Lei Feng—shaped an altruistic social atmosphere. In the 1980s, the rise of intellectual respect and scientific contribution redefined success. The Non- Possessive Economy seeks to rekindle this spirit: to celebrate diverse forms of achievement and replace materialism with meaningful, purpose-driven incentives.

5.3  Legal and Faith-Based Governance Integration

In conventional institutional design, law is often viewed as a rational constraint mechanism, while faith is relegated to the realm of personal morality. The long-term separation of these two pillars has resulted in modern capitalism's cold legality devoid of spirituality, and in

socialism’s ideological distortion of authentic spiritual faith.In conventional institutional design, law is often viewed as a rational constraint mechanism, while faith is relegated to the realm of personal morality. The long-term separation of these two pillars has resulted in modern capitalism's cold legality devoid of spirituality, and in socialism’s ideological distortion of authentic spiritual faith.

The non-possessive economy seeks to bridge this gap. It proposes a governance model that integrates the rule of law with spiritual faith—a structure where legality forms the foundational order, while faith provides the moral compass. As written in Deuteronomy: “Follow justice and justice alone, so that you may live and possess the land the Lord your

God is giving you.” (Deuteronomy 16:20). Governance, ultimately, must sustain life, direction, and trust.The non-possessive economy seeks to bridge this gap. It proposes a governance model that integrates the rule of law with spiritual faith—a structure where legality forms the foundational order, while faith provides the moral compass. As written in Deuteronomy: “Follow justice and justice alone, so that you may live and possess the land

the Lord your God is giving you.” (Deuteronomy 16:20). Governance, ultimately, must

sustain life, direction, and trust.

The governance system of a non-possessive enterprise is built on the following foundational principles:The governance system of a non-possessive enterprise is built on the following foundational principles:

1.    The legitimacy of rules must be derived from shared spiritual values. A company’s constitution should be more than a commercial contract—it should reflect the ethical credo of the organization. Rules must prioritize people as ends, not means. Employees and users are not merely subjects of management but members of a shared moral community.1. The legitimacy of rules must be derived from shared spiritual values. A company’s constitution should be more than a commercial contract—it should reflect the ethical credo of the organization. Rules must prioritize people as ends, not means. Employees and users are not merely subjects of management but members of a shared moral community.

2.    Checks and balances must include a transcendent ethical authority. When human rationality reaches its limits, faith offers humility and introspection. Therefore, the governance system must include a “Conscience Committee” or “Moral Review Council,” inspired by faith, to prevent technocratic rigidity and institutional alienation. As Proverbs reminds us: “The way of the righteous is justice, but the path of the wicked is perverse.” (Proverbs 21:8)2. Checks and balances must include a transcendent ethical authority. When human rationality reaches its limits, faith offers humility and introspection. Therefore, the governance system must include a “Conscience Committee” or “Moral Review Council,” inspired by faith, to prevent technocratic rigidity and institutional alienation. As Proverbs reminds us: “The way of the righteous is justice, but the path of the wicked is perverse.” (Proverbs 21:8)

3.    Execution must reflect principles to avoid performative morality. Governance should not exist only on paper. The system must be enacted through a tri-power structure: the board acts as the legislature, the executive team as the administration, and a judicial branch composed of consumer representatives and independent moral review bodies with veto power.3. Execution must reflect principles to avoid performative morality. Governance should not exist only on paper. The system must be enacted through a tri-power structure: the board acts as the legislature, the executive team as the administration, and a judicial branch composed of consumer representatives and independent moral review bodies with veto power.

4.    Institutional evolution must prioritize spiritual alignment over profit maximization. Decision-making should first ask: “Does this align with our faith-driven values?” Profit is a byproduct, not the goal. As Matthew teaches us: “You cannot serve both God and money.” (Matthew 6:24)4. Institutional evolution must prioritize spiritual alignment over profit maximization. Decision-making should first ask: “Does this align with our faith-driven values?” Profit is a byproduct, not the goal. As Matthew teaches us: “You cannot serve both God and money.” (Matthew 6:24) (NIV Bible, Matthew 6:24)

This faith-imbued legal architecture ensures that governance is no longer cold and mechanical, but warm, soulful, and reflective—a collective spiritual discipline. It forms the institutional backbone of the non-possessive economy and could become a blueprint for a new era of corporate civilization.This faith-imbued legal architecture ensures that governance is no longer cold and mechanical, but warm, soulful, and reflective—a collective spiritual discipline. It forms the institutional backbone of the non-possessive economy and could become a blueprint for a new era of corporate civilization.

5.4  Customer-Driven Enterprise Ecosystem and Self-Healing Crisis Mechanism

In the framework of a Non-Possessive Economy, customers are no longer passive "end consumers" but active members of the enterprise community. They are not only recipients of services, but also participants and beneficiaries in product design, value distribution, and governance. This enterprise paradigm—"from the customer, belonging to the customer, for the customer"—marks the emergence of a decentralized, trust-driven economic model.In the framework of a Non-Possessive Economy, customers are no longer passive "end consumers" but active members of the enterprise community. They are not only recipients of services, but also participants and beneficiaries in product design, value distribution, and governance. This enterprise paradigm—"from the customer, belonging to the customer, for the customer"—marks the emergence of a decentralized, trust-driven economic model.

Through token-based systems, customers receive value returns from their consumption and hold jury-like rights of oversight and veto. This breaks down the traditional barrier between shareholders and customers and compels enterprises to stay in tune with the actual needs of the market, avoiding strategic misjudgments and systemic failures.Through token-based systems, customers receive value returns from their consumption and hold jury-like rights of oversight and veto. This breaks down the traditional barrier between shareholders and customers and compels enterprises to stay in tune with the actual needs of the market, avoiding strategic misjudgments and systemic failures.

Unlike the centralized, top-down management models of traditional companies, Non- Possessive Enterprises adopt a user-centric, flat organizational structure characterized by agility and self-healing capabilities. When market anomalies arise, customers can use token feedback channels to directly influence corporate strategy, triggering rapid organizational responses and enabling dynamic adjustment with high resilience and low risk.Unlike the centralized, top-down management models of traditional companies, Non-Possessive Enterprises adopt a user-centric, flat organizational structure characterized by agility and self-healing capabilities. When market anomalies arise, customers can use token feedback channels to directly influence corporate strategy, triggering rapid organizational responses and enabling dynamic adjustment with high resilience and low risk.

This participatory mechanism also fundamentally dissolves the zero-sum logic of inter- company competition. Each enterprise serves distinct user communities with unique

cultural, ethical, and faith-based identities, fostering a diverse and co-growing ecosystem. The goal is no longer to "defeat competitors," but to "better serve customers" in alignment with a shared mission.This participatory mechanism also fundamentally dissolves the zero- sum logic of inter-company competition. Each enterprise serves distinct user communities with unique cultural, ethical, and faith-based identities, fostering a diverse and co-growing ecosystem. The goal is no longer to "defeat competitors," but to "better serve customers" in alignment with a shared mission.

As a result, the enterprise evolves into a "faith-driven platform" where customers are builders, contributors, monitors, and value co-sharers. This ongoing reciprocal relationship naturally transforms customers into long-term supporters of the company, granting the enterprise a form of spiritual resilience and a deeper social contract than traditional organizations can offer.As a result, the enterprise evolves into a "faith-driven platform" where customers are builders, contributors, monitors, and value co-sharers. This ongoing reciprocal relationship naturally transforms customers into long-term supporters of the company, granting the enterprise a form of spiritual resilience and a deeper social contract than traditional organizations can offer.

Ultimately, the Non-Possessive Economy enables enterprises to establish a self-updating, self-correcting, and self-evolving ecosystem. From products and services to governance structures, every component is organically intertwined with customer participation, allowing the enterprise to grow as a living organism in alignment with the authentic needs of humanity.Ultimately, the Non-Possessive Economy enables enterprises to establish a self- updating, self-correcting, and self-evolving ecosystem. From products and services to governance structures, every component is organically intertwined with customer participation, allowing the enterprise to grow as a living organism in alignment with the authentic needs of humanity.

5.5  Predictable Entrepreneurship: Positioning Customers as Angel Investors

In conventional economic systems, entrepreneurship is perceived as a high-risk undertaking. According to Y Combinator, one of the most renowned startup incubators in Silicon Valley, only around 5% of the startups they fund achieve significant success. This statistic reveals a troubling reality: the vast majority of entrepreneurial efforts result in failure, leading to considerable social resource waste and discouraging entrepreneurial spirit.In conventional economic systems, entrepreneurship is perceived as a high-risk undertaking. According to Y Combinator, one of the most renowned startup incubators in Silicon Valley, only around 5% of the startups they fund achieve significant success. This statistic reveals a troubling reality: the vast majority of entrepreneurial efforts result in failure, leading to considerable social resource waste and discouraging entrepreneurial spirit.

More critically, it is this extreme uncertainty and high failure rate that psychologically and institutionally legitimizes the enormous wealth rewards granted to successful founders.

Since most startups fail, those who succeed are socially and financially justified in receiving outsized compensation—often through ownership—thus reinforcing the logic of possession. Even when the original founder loses the ability or passion to lead, the logic of compensation discourages them from stepping aside.More critically, it is this extreme uncertainty and high failure rate that psychologically and institutionally legitimizes the enormous wealth rewards granted to successful founders. Since most startups fail, those who succeed are socially and financially justified in receiving outsized compensation—often through ownership—thus reinforcing the logic of possession. Even when the original founder loses the ability or passion to lead, the logic of compensation discourages them from stepping aside.

At the heart of this dilemma lies the structural separation between the enterprise and the customer. Entrepreneurs face great difficulty in accurately identifying market needs during the early stages. Customers, on the other hand, have little incentive to support unproven products or engage in co-creation, resulting in a mismatch between innovation and actual demand.At the heart of this dilemma lies the structural separation between the enterprise and the customer. Entrepreneurs face great difficulty in accurately identifying market needs during the early stages. Customers, on the other hand, have little incentive to support unproven products or engage in co-creation, resulting in a mismatch between innovation and actual demand.

The Non-Possessive Economy reframes this relationship by redefining the customer as a fundamental part of the enterprise community. In this new model, early adopters are not merely passive consumers—they become true “angel investors” who support startups not only with their wallets but with their trust, feedback, and participation.The Non-Possessive Economy reframes this relationship by redefining the customer as a fundamental part of the enterprise community. In this new model, early adopters are not merely passive consumers—they become true “angel investors” who support startups not only with their wallets but with their trust, feedback, and participation.

These customers enjoy early access to products at favorable prices and share in the enterprise's future growth through tokens, dividends, or equity-linked incentives. Such structures encourage long-term commitment and create a virtuous cycle of collaborative development. Moreover, mechanisms like crowdfunding, token-based support systems, and pre-sale models offer startups access to resources with reduced uncertainty from day one.These customers enjoy early access to products at favorable prices and share in the enterprise's future growth through tokens, dividends, or equity-linked incentives. Such structures encourage long-term commitment and create a virtuous cycle of collaborative development. Moreover, mechanisms like crowdfunding, token-based support systems, and pre-sale models offer startups access to resources with reduced uncertainty from day one.

This participatory design—“of the customers, by the customers, for the customers”—

fundamentally alters the nature of entrepreneurship. It transforms startups from uncertain

bets into high-certainty, high-efficiency social innovations. Risk is distributed. Wastage is minimized. Entrepreneurial energy is unlocked.This participatory design—“of the

customers, by the customers, for the customers”—fundamentally alters the nature of entrepreneurship. It transforms startups from uncertain bets into high-certainty, high- efficiency social innovations. Risk is distributed. Wastage is minimized. Entrepreneurial energy is unlocked.

In such a system, the need for possessive justification vanishes. Founders no longer need to hold on to absolute control or wealth accumulation to justify their initial risk.

Entrepreneurship becomes not a gamble, but a structured form of collaborative social regeneration—a shared process of creation and fulfillment aligned with collective good.In such a system, the need for possessive justification vanishes. Founders no longer need to hold on to absolute control or wealth accumulation to justify their initial risk.

Entrepreneurship becomes not a gamble, but a structured form of collaborative social regeneration—a shared process of creation and fulfillment aligned with collective good.

5.6  Shared Intelligence through an Amoeba-like Organizational Structure

Within the framework of a Non-Possessive Economy, organizational governance shifts from a control-based, hierarchical structure to a model centered on “shared intelligence.” Inspired by the biological characteristics of the amoeba, this governance model emphasizes autonomy at the micro-level while maintaining a strong sense of responsibility to the macro-whole—forming a hive-like, decentralized network within enterprises.Within the framework of a Non-Possessive Economy, organizational governance shifts from a control- based, hierarchical structure to a model centered on “shared intelligence.” Inspired by the biological characteristics of the amoeba, this governance model emphasizes autonomy at the micro-level while maintaining a strong sense of responsibility to the macro-whole— forming a hive-like, decentralized network within enterprises.

Non-possessiveness in this context is not limited to wealth; it equally applies to power and control. Traditional corporate governance has long operated under a pyramidal structure designed to resolve the contradiction between unlimited governance power and limited governance capacity. While this approach made sense in eras of poor communication and low productivity, it now reveals structural flaws: information distortion, resource inefficiency, bureaucratic bloat, and power centralization.Non-possessiveness in this context is not limited to wealth; it equally applies to power and control. Traditional corporate governance has long operated under a pyramidal structure designed to resolve the contradiction between unlimited governance power and limited governance capacity. While this approach made sense in eras of poor communication and low productivity, it now reveals structural flaws: information distortion, resource inefficiency, bureaucratic bloat, and power centralization.

With the rise of artificial intelligence, automation, and ubiquitous information networks, the necessity for middle management—often based on positional power and dependency—has fundamentally diminished. Repetitive tasks can now be offloaded to AI agents, and internal communication can be instant and transparent. This collapse of the rationale for pyramidal control paves the way for a new governance model in which each organizational unit operates with autonomy, coordination, and accountability, enabled by real-time data sharing.With the rise of artificial intelligence, automation, and ubiquitous information networks, the necessity for middle management—often based on positional power and dependency—has fundamentally diminished. Repetitive tasks can now be offloaded to AI agents, and internal communication can be instant and transparent. This collapse of the rationale for pyramidal control paves the way for a new governance model in which each organizational unit operates with autonomy, coordination, and accountability, enabled by real-time data sharing.

This hive-like, “amoeba-style” architecture offers more than efficiency gains—it dismantles the very mechanisms that give rise to possessive tendencies within institutional power

structures. It echoes the biblical call that “everything should be done in a fitting and orderly way” (1 Corinthians 14:40), underscoring that governance must serve order and justice, not personal ambition.This hive-like, “amoeba-style” architecture offers more than efficiency gains—it dismantles the very mechanisms that give rise to possessive tendencies within

institutional power structures. It echoes the biblical call that “everything should be done in a fitting and orderly way” (1 Corinthians 14:40), underscoring that governance must serve order and justice, not personal ambition.

Thus, shared intelligence represents a fundamental institutional response to decentralization and collective autonomy. It marks a civilization-level shift—from human- invented hierarchies to divine-order-based ecosystems—laying the structural foundation for the future of the Non-Possessive Economy.Thus, shared intelligence represents a fundamental institutional response to decentralization and collective autonomy. It marks a civilization-level shift—from human-invented hierarchies to divine-order-based ecosystems—laying the structural foundation for the future of the Non-Possessive Economy.